Skip to content

Closed

Decided

Aug 14, 2023

Commercial LitigationFinancial services

Fannie/Freddie Shareholders v. FHFA

In re Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class Action Litigations (Net Worth Sweep)

Shareholders win $812M over the Fannie–Freddie profit sweep

At stake
$812M
Latest event
Jul 24, 20263 months ago
Commenced
201313 yr 4 mo ago
Decided
Aug 14, 2023Decided
Court
D.D.C.1:13-mc-01288

Shareholder classes won a $612.4M jury verdict, $812M with interest, against FHFA over the 2012 “net worth sweep” of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac profits. The D.C. Circuit unanimously affirmed the judgment on July 24, 2026, as Washington pushes to release the GSEs from conservatorship.

Latest development Jul 24, 2026

On July 24, 2026, the D.C. Circuit issued an opinion and judgment affirming the $812M judgment against FHFA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac, rejecting the defendants’ arguments for reversal including that Collins v. Yellen required dismissal of the claims.

Why it matters

The last big shareholder win in the decade-long GSE litigation wars, and its fate in the D.C. Circuit lands just as the multi-hundred-billion-dollar Fannie/Freddie privatization takes shape, directly affecting how legacy shareholders fare in any release from conservatorship.

Background

In August 2012, four years into the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, FHFA and the Treasury adopted the “Third Amendment” to the senior preferred stock purchase agreements, sweeping the enterprises’ entire net worth to the government each quarter in place of a fixed 10% dividend. Junior preferred and common shareholders sued in 2013, arguing the sweep gutted any prospect of dividends or residual value. After the Supreme Court’s Collins v. Yellen narrowed the statutory attacks, the consolidated D.D.C. class action proceeded on the theory that the sweep breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the shareholders’ contracts. A first trial ended in a hung jury in late 2022. On retrial, a jury on August 14, 2023, unanimously found for the classes and awarded $612.4M, and Judge Royce Lamberth entered final judgment of approximately $812M including prejudgment interest on March 20, 2024.

Lamberth denied FHFA’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law on March 14, 2025, finding “ample evidence” behind the verdict. FHFA’s appeal was argued before a three-judge D.C. Circuit panel on April 21, 2026, with the agency defending its broad conservator powers and the classes urging that Collins settled only FHFA’s authority to adopt the sweep, not whether doing so breached shareholders’ reasonable expectations. On July 24, 2026, the panel unanimously affirmed, rejecting the argument that Collins v. Yellen forecloses the implied-covenant claim, while the administration simultaneously advances plans to take the enterprises out of conservatorship, a release in which the same junior shareholders hold a direct stake.

Timeline 9 events

  1. Appeal
    D.C. Circuit affirms $812M judgment against FHFA

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the district court’s $812M judgment in favor of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholder classes, rejecting FHFA’s arguments including that Collins v. Yellen required dismissal of the claims.

    Fairholme Funds, Inc v. FHFA, No. 25-5113 (D.C. Cir. 2026)BSF's Novel Theory Delivers $812M Win For Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Shareholders

  2. Hearing
    D.C. Circuit hears FHFA’s appeal

    A three-judge panel actively questions both sides on conservator powers and the reach of Collins v. Yellen.

    Oral Arguments Heard in Fannie Mae Shareholders Class Action — BSF

  3. Order
    Court denies FHFA’s post-trial JMOL motion

    Lamberth upholds the verdict, citing “ample evidence” supporting the jury’s findings.

    Official class action case site

  4. Judgment
    Final judgment of ~$812M entered

    Judge Lamberth’s judgment adds prejudgment interest to the verdict.

    BLBG case page

  5. Judgment
    Retrial jury awards shareholder classes $612.4M

    The jury unanimously finds FHFA breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by adopting the sweep.

    BSF trial announcement

  6. Other
    First trial ends in a hung jury

    BSF trial announcement

  7. Appeal
    D.C. Circuit revives contract-based claims

    While upholding dismissal of the statutory claims, the court of appeals lets the implied-covenant theory proceed.

    BLBG case page

  8. Filing
    Shareholder class actions filed and consolidated in D.D.C

    BLBG case page

  9. Other
    FHFA and Treasury adopt the “net worth sweep”

    The Third Amendment replaces the 10% dividend with a quarterly sweep of the enterprises’ entire net worth to Treasury.