NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine v. PJSC Gazprom (Transit Ship-or-Pay Award Enforcement)

Enforcement International Arbitration Energy $1.37B award

Naftogaz won a $1.37B Zurich-seated ICC award over Gazprom’s unpaid ship-or-pay transit fees. After Switzerland’s highest court made it final in March 2026, Kazakhstan’s AIFC Court first authorized, then set aside, enforcement, leaving the hunt for Gazprom assets to continue.

The AIFC Court in Kazakhstan set aside its 21 May 2026 recognition of the $1.4B award, ruling it lacked jurisdiction because the dispute has no legal connection to Kazakhstan. The parties were given 14 days for costs submissions and Naftogaz’s enforcement campaign moves elsewhere.

Under the five-year transit agreement signed in December 2019, Gazprom committed to pay for a minimum volume of gas transportation across Ukraine on ship-or-pay terms. After Russia’s full-scale invasion, transit through the Sokhranivka entry point was suspended under force majeure in May 2022 and Gazprom stopped paying in full. Naftogaz commenced ICC arbitration in September 2022. In June 2025, the Zurich-seated tribunal awarded Naftogaz US$1.37B, comprising principal debt for transit services, late-payment interest and costs. Gazprom’s set-aside application failed: on 11 March 2026 the Swiss Federal Supreme Court upheld the award, making it final.

With Gazprom holding no meaningful assets in Ukraine or the West, the case has become a live experiment in monetizing awards against the company in ‘friendly’ third states. On 21 May 2026, the AIFC Court in Astana recognized the award, the first foreign court publicly to authorize its enforcement, with Gazprom’s 50% stake in KazRosGaz the obvious target, but Kazakhstan’s justice ministry immediately signalled resistance, and on 9 July 2026 the AIFC Court set its ruling aside, holding the dispute has no legal connection to Kazakhstan and falls outside its jurisdiction. Naftogaz is weighing an appeal and enforcement filings in other jurisdictions, while Gazprom faces roughly €19.5B in further claims from former European customers.

  1. JUL 9, 2026ENFORCEMENT
    AIFC Court sets aside its recognition for lack of jurisdiction
    The court holds the award has no legal connection to Kazakhstan. Costs submissions due within 14 days, and Naftogaz’s asset hunt shifts to other jurisdictions.
  2. MAY 21, 2026ENFORCEMENT
    AIFC Court authorizes enforcement in Kazakhstan
    The first foreign court publicly to recognize the award opens a path to Gazprom’s Kazakh assets, notably its 50% stake in KazRosGaz. Kazakhstan’s justice ministry quickly signals it will not act as a ‘transit platform’ for enforcement.
  3. MAR 11, 2026JUDGMENT
    Swiss Federal Supreme Court rejects Gazprom’s set-aside bid
    The award becomes final and enforceable under the New York Convention.
  4. AUG 6, 2025OTHER
    Russian court issues anti-enforcement injunction against Naftogaz
    The Arbitrazh Court of Saint Petersburg and the Leningrad Region (case no. A56-52159/2025) prohibited Naftogaz from seeking recognition and enforcement of the ICC award outside Russia and from continuing related foreign proceedings, an order that predated and ran parallel to the Kazakh AIFC Court proceedings.
  5. JUN 2025AWARD
    Zurich-seated ICC tribunal awards Naftogaz $1.37B
    The award covers principal debt for transit services under the 2019 agreement, late-payment interest and legal costs.
  6. SEP 2022FILING
    Naftogaz files ICC arbitration over unpaid ship-or-pay fees
  7. MAY 2022OTHER
    Transit through Sokhranivka suspended. Gazprom cuts payments
    Force majeure is declared over the Russian-occupied entry point and Gazprom stops paying full ship-or-pay fees under the 2019 transit contract.