Skip to content

Rank

76

4 places down No. 72 last week

Mass TortMass torts & product liabilityTechnology

Uber Sexual Assault MDL

In re Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation (MDL No. 3084)

Passengers say Uber failed to protect them from sexual assaults by drivers

Rank, last 10 weeks Best No. 57 · lowest No. 76
No. 11020304050607080 5759707276
At stake
$1B+Stakes rated 25 of 100
Score
44.4Out of 100
Latest event
Oct 2, 20265 weeks ago
Next step
Not scheduledNothing dated on the record yet
Commenced
Oct 20233 yr ago
Court
N.D. Cal.MDL No. 3084

Stage

Trial. A trial, or a series of bellwether trials, is under way or scheduled. How cases are placed

  1. Filed
  2. Pre-trial
  3. TrialNow
  4. Decision
  5. Appeal
  6. Enforcement

Nearly 4,000 passengers allege in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California that Uber failed to protect them from sexual assaults by drivers. Two federal bellwether juries have found Uber liable, awarding $8.5M and $5,000, and Uber settled the third bellwether on October 2, 2026, just before opening statements. The court has set the next bellwether trial for January 17, 2027.

Latest development Oct 2, 2026

On October 2, 2026, Uber settled Jane Doe QLF 001 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., the third federal bellwether in MDL No. 3084. The settlement came after jury selection in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas and just before opening statements. Plaintiffs’ co-lead counsel said Uber stipulated that the assault occurred and urged it to pursue a global resolution for the remaining claimants.

Why it matters

The litigation tests whether rideshare platforms answer for crimes drivers commit through their apps, and whether Uber owes passengers a common carrier’s heightened duty of care. The answers affect roughly 3,940 pending federal claims and any global settlement.

Background

Uber’s own safety reports disclosed thousands of sexual assault reports on its platform, including nearly 6,000 for 2017–18 alone. Passengers across the country then sued Uber Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiary Rasier LLC. They allege that the company failed to adequately screen and monitor drivers and withheld safety features. They also allege that it marketed rides as safe to intoxicated and vulnerable users. A parallel coordinated state proceeding (JCCP No. 5188) is pending before Judge Ethan P. Schulman in San Francisco Superior Court.

In October 2023, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) centralized the federal cases as MDL No. 3084. It assigned them to Judge Charles R. Breyer in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. In May 2024, Judge Breyer rejected Uber’s attempt to use its terms of use against consolidation. In July 2025, he dismissed parts of the fraud and product-liability claims but preserved the core negligence and misrepresentation claims. In October 2025, a jury in the first trial in the state proceeding found Uber negligent but not liable.

On February 5, 2026, a Phoenix jury returned the first MDL bellwether verdict after a trial of nearly four weeks that featured testimony from Uber’s founder and CEO. It found Uber liable on an apparent-agency theory and awarded $8.5M. In April 2026, a second bellwether jury on North Carolina facts found Uber liable but awarded only $5,000 in damages. Judge Breyer separately held that Uber can be treated as a common carrier under North Carolina law, which carries a heightened duty of care. By July 2026, roughly 3,940 cases were pending, and the court had scheduled the next two bellwether trials to begin September 14, 2026.

On August 17, 2026, Judge Breyer denied Uber’s motion to strike the plaintiff’s punitive damages claim in the next bellwether, Jane Doe QLF 001 v. Uber. Uber moved for summary judgment in that case on September 11, 2026. In September 2026, the court appointed a settlement master, and plaintiffs’ counsel reportedly asked it to refresh the depleted bellwether pool and begin remanding non-bellwether cases to their home districts. On October 2, 2026, after jury selection in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Uber settled the case just before opening statements. Plaintiffs’ co-lead counsel said Uber had stipulated that the assault occurred, and the court has since set the next bellwether trial for January 17, 2027.

Timeline 18 events

  1. Settlement
    Uber settles third bellwether case before opening statements

    Uber settled Jane Doe QLF 001 v. Uber Technologies, Inc., the third federal bellwether in MDL No. 3084, in the Western District of Texas. Plaintiffs’ co-lead counsel said Uber stipulated that the assault occurred and urged a broader resolution for other claimants.

    Uber Settles Bellwether In Sex Assault MDL Before TrialUber Settles Background Check Sexual Assault Case Less Than 48 Hours After Jury SelectionUber Settles Background Check Sexual Assault Case Less Than 48 Hours After Jury Selection

  2. Order
    Court sets fourth MDL bellwether trial for January 2027

    Following the settlement of the third bellwether case, the court scheduled the next MDL 3084 bellwether jury trial for January 17, 2027.

    Uber Multi-District Litigation UpdatesUber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Update: October 2026 Settlements & How to FileUber Settles Bellwether Sexual Assault Case Before Third Trial

  3. Filing
    Uber moves for summary judgment in Jane Doe QLF 001 bellwether

    Uber filed a motion for summary judgment in the Jane Doe QLF 001 bellwether case ahead of trial. Plaintiff’s opposition was due September 25, 2026.

    Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit MDL 3084 Updates: June 2026 - Rideshare Rape

  4. Order
    Court temporarily bars Uber from using marketing-vendor data

    The court temporarily banned Uber from seeking, accessing, or using materials from a third-party legal marketing and client-acquisition service in the litigation.

    Uber Multi-District Litigation Updates | September 2026 Update

  5. Order
    Court orders release of bellwether driver’s military records

    Ahead of the Jane Doe QLF 001 bellwether trial, the court ordered release of the driver’s complete Army discharge records. The records concern his removal from active duty in 2020, months after the alleged assault.

    Uber Multi-District Litigation Updates | September 2026 Update

  6. Order
    Court appoints settlement master for MDL

    Following Judge Breyer’s criticism of Uber’s piecemeal settlement approach, the court appointed a settlement master to begin facilitating settlement discussions across the MDL.

    Uber Multi-District Litigation Updates | September 2026 Update

  7. Order
    Magistrate judge rejects Uber bid to limit third-party depositions

    Magistrate Judge Lisa Cisneros rejected Uber’s request to limit third-party depositions in the Jane Doe QLF 001 bellwether case. Uber had argued that additional depositions were unduly burdensome ahead of trial.

    Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit | September 2026 Litigation Update

  8. Order
    Plaintiffs propose refreshed bellwether pool and remand track

    Plaintiffs’ counsel reportedly asked the court to add cases to the depleted bellwether pool, use streamlined discovery, and begin remanding groups of non-bellwether cases to their home districts. They also disputed Uber’s identification of a few cases with allegedly non-bona-fide ride receipts.

    Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit | September 2026 Litigation UpdateUber MDL Lawsuit | September 2026 UpdateUber Multi-District Litigation Updates | September 2026 UpdateUber Sexual Assault MDL Verdict: NC Jury Awards $5K in Second Bellwether Trial

  9. Order
    Judge Breyer denies Uber’s motion to strike punitive damages claim

    The ruling concerned the Jane Doe QLF 001 bellwether case. The court also declined to intervene in a separate dispute between Uber and plaintiffs’ counsel over media coverage of the litigation.

    Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit [2026 Update]

  10. Filing
    Uber moves to strike punitive damages claim in Jane Doe QLF 001

    Uber argued that Texas law bars punitive damages against a defendant based on a third party’s criminal act.

    Uber Asks MDL Judge to Strike Punitive Damages Claim in Driver Sexual Assault CaseCASE NO. 3:23-MD-03084-CRB Order Setting Trial Schedule

  11. Order
    Judge Breyer approves schedule for fourth federal bellwether trial

    Judge Charles Breyer issued an order approving a joint proposed schedule for a fourth federal bellwether trial in MDL No. 3084, to begin October 5, 2026. The order set key pretrial deadlines but did not identify which case has been selected for trial.

    Fourth Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Set for Oct. 2026

  12. Order
    Docket nears 4,000 cases as next trials are set

    Pending cases reached roughly 3,940, up 369 in a month, as filings accelerated. The next two bellwether trials were then scheduled to begin September 14, 2026, before Judge Breyer.

    MDL 3084 case statistics

  13. Judgment
    Judge Breyer rules Uber a common carrier, jury awards $5,000

    Judge Breyer held that Uber can be treated as a common carrier under North Carolina law, with a heightened duty of care. The second bellwether jury found liability on Charlotte facts but awarded nominal damages of $5,000.

    Uber bellwether verdicts 2026

  14. Judgment
    Phoenix jury awards $8.5M in first MDL bellwether

    The jury found Uber liable on an apparent-agency theory for the 2023 rape of a 19-year-old passenger. Evidence at the nearly four-week trial showed that Uber’s own risk algorithm had flagged the trip.

    Chaffin Luhana verdict announcement

  15. Judgment
    State-court jury finds Uber negligent but not liable

    A San Francisco jury in the parallel state proceeding found Uber negligent but declined to hold it liable for the plaintiff’s assault.

    Verus MDL 3084 overview

  16. Order
    Judge Breyer trims claims but preserves core theories

    Judge Breyer dismissed parts of the fraud and product-liability claims while preserving the negligence and misrepresentation theories at the heart of the MDL.

  17. Order
    Court rejects Uber’s terms-of-use challenge to consolidation

    Verus MDL 3084 overview

  18. Filing
    JPML centralizes passenger sexual-assault suits

    Federal cases were consolidated before Judge Charles R. Breyer in the Northern District of California as MDL No. 3084.

    Verus MDL 3084 overview

Experimental AI forecast

How it is made

Which will happen first in MDL No. 3084 by September 30, 2027: a global Uber settlement, a plaintiff bellwether verdict, or an Uber bellwether win?

  • Uber agrees to global MDL settlement36%
  • Jury finds Uber liable in next bellwether26%
  • Still pending on September 30, 202725%
  • Uber wins a bellwether at trial or on motion13%
Resolves by
Sep 30, 2027in 11 months
Record confidence
Medium

A global settlement of the roughly 3,940 MDL claims is the single most likely first decisive step, at 36%, by September 30, 2027. Uber has lost both federal bellwether verdicts and settled the third before openings. The court has also appointed a settlement master after criticizing Uber’s piecemeal approach.

How it resolves. Resolves on whichever of these occurs first after October 4, 2026, based on court records or public statements by the parties. (a) Uber and plaintiffs’ leadership publicly announce an agreement or term sheet meant to resolve all or substantially all claims pending in MDL No. 3084. (b) A federal jury in an MDL No. 3084 bellwether trial returns a verdict finding Uber liable. (c) Uber wins a federal bellwether by defense verdict, summary judgment, or judgment as a matter of law. (d) None of these occurs by September 30, 2027. Individual bellwether settlements and state JCCP rulings do not count.

Reasoning

Starting point. Federal mass tort MDLs after multiple plaintiff bellwether verdicts and appointment of a settlement master: Most large MDLs end in global or inventory settlements, often within one to two years after a run of plaintiff bellwether verdicts. Roughly a third to half reach a global deal within a year of a settlement master’s appointment.

The previous forecast asked a different question, which Uber’s October 2, 2026, settlement of Jane Doe QLF 001 has now answered, so its numbers are not compared. Mass tort MDLs usually end in global or inventory deals, and pressure builds once bellwethers go against the defendant. Here plaintiffs won liability in both tried federal bellwethers, the court denied Uber’s bid to strike punitive damages, and Uber settled the third case with a stipulation that the assault occurred. The September 2026 settlement master appointment and plaintiffs’ push for remand of non-bellwether cases raise Uber’s cost of fighting on. Against that, the $5,000 verdict and the state jury’s no-liability finding give Uber grounds to hold out, and filings are still growing. A depleted bellwether pool means new trials may not start for several months, which limits both verdict outcomes. The leading alternative is that no global deal arrives and the next federal bellwether yields another plaintiff verdict.

Plaintiffs won liability in both tried federal bellwethers · Settlement master appointed after court criticized piecemeal settlements · Uber settled third bellwether before openings, stipulating the assault · Depleted bellwether pool may delay the next federal trial · Low damages and state defense verdict give Uber leverage

Previous forecast: missed “How will the Jane Doe QLF 001 v. Uber bellwether trial, set for jury selection on September 30, 2026, be resolved by December 31, 2026?” (Sep 30, 2026). Uber settled the Jane Doe QLF 001 bellwether case on October 2, 2026, before opening statements. The settlement came while the forecast stood. It put “Case settles or is dropped” at 17%. Track record

Generated automatically by Claude Opus 5.5 on Oct 4, 2026 from this case’s record on this site, and published without editorial review. The probabilities are the model’s judgment, not measured frequencies, and they are scored publicly as cases resolve. Not legal or investment advice. How the forecasts are made