Skip to content

Rank

33

1 places up No. 34 last week

Regulatory / CompetitionAntitrust & competitionTechnology

FTC v. Amazon (Ad Auction)

Federal Trade Commission and State of Washington, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (Advertising Auction Manipulation)

Regulators accuse Amazon of secretly rigging its ad-auction prices

Rank, last 10 weeks Best No. 30 · lowest No. 36
No. 110203040 303334363433
At stake
$20B+Stakes rated 46 of 100
Score
59.8Out of 100
Latest event
Sep 20268 weeks ago
Next step
Not scheduledNothing dated on the record yet
Commenced
Aug 31, 20262 mo ago
Court
W.D. Wash.2:26-cv-03097

Stage

Filed. The claim is filed. Pleadings and early motions come next. How cases are placed

  1. FiledNow
  2. Pre-trial
  3. Trial
  4. Decision
  5. Appeal
  6. Enforcement

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and 22 state attorneys general are suing Amazon in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. They allege Amazon secretly manipulated its sponsored-ad auctions and overcharged about 1.2 million advertisers by more than $20B since 2019. Amazon denies the allegations, and the case is at the pleadings stage.

Latest development Sep 2026

In September 2026, Bloomberg Law reported that Amazon’s defense team includes Karen Dunn and Jeannie Rhee of Dunn Isaacson Rhee LLP and William Savitt of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. The case remains at the pleadings stage, with no ruling yet on the merits or on any motion to dismiss.

Why it matters

The case will decide whether Amazon deceived advertisers about how its sponsored-ad auctions set prices, and whether that conduct was unfair. It affects roughly 1.2 million advertisers and is separate from the Federal Trade Commission’s marketplace monopolization suit against Amazon.

Background

On August 31, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued Amazon.com, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The attorneys general of 22 states, led by Washington, joined the suit. The complaint alleges that, starting in 2019, Amazon secretly overrode the results of the “second-price” auctions that it told advertisers set the cost of its sponsored ads. These included Sponsored Products, Sponsored Brands, and Sponsored Display placements on Amazon.com and its mobile app.

The government contends Amazon told advertisers they would pay only one cent more than the next-highest bidder. Instead, it says, Amazon imposed undisclosed surcharges that inflated prices for roughly 1.2 million advertising customers, including more than 500,000 small and medium-sized businesses. The complaint frames the conduct as both a deceptive and an unfair practice, citing internal Amazon documents and employee communications. Regulators say those materials show the company knew advertisers believed they were bidding in a genuine second-price auction. The FTC and the states allege the scheme let Amazon extract more than $20B over roughly seven years, much of it passed on to consumers.

The plaintiffs seek an injunction to stop the practice, monetary relief, and civil penalties under state consumer-protection statutes. Amazon has denied the allegations, calling the lawsuit “misguided” and “flawed” and arguing that the FTC “cherry-picked” outdated internal documents. The company says average winning bids for sponsored-product ads fell by half between 2019 and 2025. It also says advertisers adjust bids based on real-world ad performance rather than a description of auction mechanics.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a separate, parallel lawsuit the same day. It makes similar allegations under Texas consumer-protection law, and Texas did not join the federal case. The case is also distinct from the FTC’s earlier monopolization suit against Amazon over its marketplace conduct, which remains pending before a different judge in the same district. As of September 2026, Amazon’s defense team includes lawyers from Dunn Isaacson Rhee LLP and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. The case is at the pleadings stage, with no ruling yet on the merits or on any motion to dismiss.

Timeline 5 events

  1. Order
    Amazon retains Dunn Isaacson Rhee and Wachtell Lipton

    Bloomberg Law reported that Amazon’s defense team includes Karen Dunn and Jeannie Rhee of Dunn Isaacson Rhee LLP and William Savitt of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz.

    Amazon Taps All-Star Legal Lineup to Fight FTC Advertising Suit

  2. Other
    Amazon publicly denies ad-auction allegations

    Amazon posted a blog response calling the lawsuit “misguided” and “flawed,” saying regulators relied on outdated internal documents and that average ad costs fell over the relevant period.

    FTC and 22 states sue Amazon over alleged secret ad surcharge scheme

  3. Filing
    Texas attorney general files separate ad-auction suit against Amazon

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced a parallel lawsuit against Amazon over the same alleged auction-rigging conduct. He seeks civil penalties under Texas consumer-protection law rather than joining the federal case.

    Attorney General Ken Paxton Sues Amazon for Rigging Advertising Auctions That Overcharged Businesses $4.5 Billion in a Single Year

  4. Filing
    FTC and 22 states sue Amazon over ad-auction pricing

    The FTC and 22 state attorneys general filed suit in the Western District of Washington alleging Amazon secretly manipulated ad-auction pricing to overcharge advertisers by more than $20B.

    FTC, States Sue Amazon Over Secret Ad Surcharge SchemeAmazon Faces FTC Suit Claiming It Misled Advertisers on Pricing

  5. Other
    Bloomberg reports FTC weighing ad-auction suit against Amazon

    Bloomberg reported that the FTC had drafted a potential complaint against Amazon over advertising practices, with multiple state attorneys general also involved.

    Amazon Faces Billions in Penalties From Potential FTC Ad Suit

Experimental AI forecast

How it is made
Predicted outcome
Insufficient evidence
Model confidence
Low

The case was filed one month ago. No assigned judge is on file, no motion to dismiss has been filed, and no briefing schedule or ruling exists. A forecast will become possible once Amazon files its response to the complaint and the court sets a schedule for deciding any motion to dismiss.

No motion to dismiss or answer filed yet · No assigned judge or scheduling order on file · Multistate coalition and parallel Texas suit complicate early settlement · Government deception claims usually survive pleadings challenges

Generated automatically by Claude Opus 5.5 on Sep 29, 2026 from this case’s record on this site, and published without editorial review. The probabilities are the model’s judgment, not measured frequencies, and they are scored publicly as cases resolve. Not legal or investment advice. How the forecasts are made

Disclosure: Anthropic, which makes the model that wrote this forecast, competes with or has commercial ties to a party to this case.