Skip to content

Netherlands

24

of 50 Netherlands cases

Class Action / Collective ProceedingsBanking

NetherlandsPart of the Netherlands collection, outside the ranked index.

Milieudefensie v. ING

Vereniging Milieudefensie v. ING Groep N.V. and ING Bank N.V.

Milieudefensie says ING must halve its financed emissions and stop backing fossil expansion

At stake
Injunctive relief
Score
37.0Provisional, impact not rated yet
Latest event
Sep 9, 20268 weeks ago
Next step
Dec 2, 2026Milieudefensie due to file its reply
Commenced
Mar 28, 20251 yr 7 mo ago
Court
District Court of AmsterdamC/13/766933 / HA ZA 25-896

Milieudefensie, the Dutch member of Friends of the Earth, is suing ING Groep and ING Bank in the District Court of Amsterdam. It alleges that ING’s financing of high-emitting clients breaches its duty of care and seeks orders to cut emissions sharply by 2030. On September 9, 2026, the court held Milieudefensie admissible. Milieudefensie’s reply is due on December 2, 2026, and a two-day hearing is planned for mid-2027.

Latest development Sep 9, 2026

On September 9, 2026, the District Court of Amsterdam held Milieudefensie admissible in its collective action against ING, so the case proceeds to the merits. The court left ING’s argument that the orders would not cut real-world emissions for the merits. Milieudefensie’s reply is due on December 2, 2026.

Why it matters

The case will test whether the duty of care that Milieudefensie invoked against Shell extends to a bank’s financed emissions. A ruling against ING could set emission and lending conditions for Dutch banks and their corporate clients.

Background

On January 18, 2024, Milieudefensie, the Dutch member of Friends of the Earth, told ING that it held the bank liable for contributing to dangerous climate change. It pointed to ING’s financing of high-emitting companies. ING replied in February 2024 and again on February 4, 2025, after new demands. On March 28, 2025, Milieudefensie served a summons on ING Groep and ING Bank in the District Court of Amsterdam. It brought a collective action under the Dutch Act on Collective Damages Claims (WAMCA). Roger Cox, who acted for Milieudefensie against Shell, leads its legal team.

Milieudefensie alleges that ING, as a large systemic bank, breaches an unwritten duty of care under Dutch law. It asks the court to order ING to align its climate policy with the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement. ING would have to cut its emissions, including those it finances, by at least 48% for CO2 and 43% for all greenhouse gases by 2030 against 2019. ING would also have to require credible climate plans from large corporate clients. It would have to stop new financing for fossil fuel companies that expand production or lack a phase-out plan.

ING filed its statement of defense on February 17, 2026. It calls the demands unrealistic and unreasonable and says that they would force it to stop doing business with many companies and homeowners. ING argues that other banks would finance clients it dropped, so real-world emissions would not fall. It also argues that Dutch and EU climate and banking laws deliberately do not require banks to leave emission-intensive sectors, and that its own targets are science-based.

On September 9, 2026, the court held Milieudefensie admissible. It found that whether the orders would actually reduce emissions, as ING disputes, is a question for the merits. It also rejected ING’s argument that Milieudefensie misleads its supporters into thinking that ING itself emits the financed emissions. The court ordered a further written round and asked Milieudefensie to confine its reply to eight themes. Milieudefensie’s reply is due on December 2, 2026, and ING’s rejoinder on March 3, 2027. A two-day hearing is planned for the second half of the second quarter of 2027.

Timeline 6 events

  1. Scheduled filing
    ING due to file its rejoinder

    A two-day hearing is to follow in the second half of the second quarter of 2027.

    District Court of Amsterdam (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2026:9098)

  2. Scheduled filing
    Milieudefensie due to file its reply

    The court limited the reply to 100 pages and asked Milieudefensie to confine it to eight themes.

    District Court of Amsterdam (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2026:9098)

  3. Judgment
    District Court of Amsterdam holds Milieudefensie admissible

    The court found that Milieudefensie met the requirements for a collective action and referred the case to a further written round before a hearing.

    District Court of Amsterdam (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2026:9098)Milieudefensie (September 10, 2026)

  4. Filing
    ING files its statement of defense

    ING called the demands unrealistic and unreasonable and argued that other lenders would finance clients it dropped.

    ING: Climate case

  5. Filing
    Milieudefensie serves summons on ING in the District Court of Amsterdam

    The collective action seeks cuts in ING’s financed emissions by 2030 and an end to financing for fossil fuel companies that expand production.

    District Court of Amsterdam (ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2026:9098)Dutch News (March 28, 2025)

  6. Other
    Milieudefensie holds ING liable for its climate impact

    The group sent ING a notice of liability and threatened legal proceedings unless the bank changed its climate policy.

    ING: Climate caseDutch News (January 2024)