Skip to content

Netherlands

30

of 50 Netherlands cases

Regulatory / CompetitionOn AppealEnergy

NetherlandsPart of the Netherlands collection, outside the ranked index.

NAM v. Netherlands (Groningen Levies)

Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V. v. the Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations

NAM contests State levies for Groningen earthquake damage and falling home values

At stake
€764M leviesAbout $855M in US dollars
Score
36.1Provisional, impact not rated yet
Latest event
Jul 21, 20263 months ago
Next step
Not scheduledNothing dated on the record yet
Commenced
Jul 29, 20242 yr 3 mo ago
Court
Council of State, Administrative Jurisdiction DivisionLEE 24/3332

Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij (NAM), the Groningen gas field operator, challenges about €764M in levies the State imposed for earthquake damage and home value losses compensated in 2020 and 2021. On June 12, 2026, the District Court of Northern Netherlands upheld the damage levies and annulled the value-loss decision insofar as it covered unsold homes. NAM and the Minister have appealed to the Council of State.

Latest development Jul 21, 2026

On July 21, 2026, the Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations appealed to the Council of State against the judgment that annulled the value-loss levy decision for unsold homes. NAM had appealed both June 12 judgments on July 20, 2026. No hearing date has been announced.

Why it matters

The Council of State will decide how far the State may charge NAM for Groningen compensation schemes that pay without proof that gas production caused the damage. The answer shapes future levies on NAM, which the State has projected at about €7.4B for 2025 to 2031.

Background

Under the Groningen Temporary Act (TwG), the Groningen Mining Damage Institute (IMG) compensates damage caused by gas production from the Groningen field. The State recovers the costs through levies on the field’s operator, Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij (NAM). NAM is owned equally by Shell and ExxonMobil. It says the State’s schemes pay for damage not linked to gas production and challenges the size of the payouts it is charged for.

NAM challenged levies of about €268M for physical damage and the IMG’s costs in the third and fourth quarters of 2020. It also challenged levies of about €495M for compensation of falling home values in the fourth quarter of 2020 and in 2021. The Minister upheld the levies on objection in June 2024 and April 2025. NAM appealed to the District Court of Northern Netherlands, which heard the cases in Groningen in March 2026.

On June 12, 2026, the court dismissed the appeal on physical damage. It held that the TwG requires the Minister to pass on all costs of the IMG’s statutory tasks. It also held that the IMG could base the affected area on the Bommer calculation model. In the value-loss case, the court upheld the levies for sold homes. It annulled the decision insofar as it covered unsold homes, whose loss in value could not be assessed in the abstract at the January 1, 2019, reference date. It ordered the Minister to take a new decision.

NAM appealed both judgments to the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State on July 20, 2026, and the Minister appealed the value-loss judgment on July 21, 2026. NAM has also challenged the levy for physical damage in 2021. On December 8, 2025, the court had refused to suspend €1.35B in levies for 2024 costs, which NAM paid. Shell and ExxonMobil are challenging the Minister’s decision that they lack standing to object to levies imposed on NAM.

Timeline 10 events

  1. Appeal
    Minister appeals the value-loss judgment

    Government letter of September 14, 2026

  2. Appeal
    NAM appeals both judgments to the Council of State

    On the same day, NAM also appealed the decision on its objection to the 2021 physical damage levy.

    Government letter of September 14, 2026

  3. Judgment
    District court upholds damage levies and annuls value-loss decision in part

    The court dismissed the physical damage appeal and annulled the value-loss decision insofar as it covered unsold homes.

    ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2026:2286ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2026:2290

  4. Order
    Minister rules Shell and ExxonMobil objections inadmissible

    The Minister found that NAM’s shareholders had no direct interest in the levy decisions. Shell and ExxonMobil appealed to the court on May 26, 2026.

    Government letter of September 14, 2026

  5. Hearing
    District court hears NAM’s levy appeals in Groningen

    DutchNews, March 16, 2026

  6. Judgment
    Court refuses to suspend €1.35B in 2024 levies

    The judge found no urgency because NAM did not dispute that it could pay. NAM paid the levies on December 30, 2025.

    Tweede Kamer 33 529, no. 1369

  7. Order
    Minister upholds the value-loss levies on objection

    NAM appealed to the District Court of Northern Netherlands on June 2, 2025.

    ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2026:2290

  8. Order
    Minister rejects NAM’s objections to the 2020 damage levies

    ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2026:2286

  9. Other
    State levies €314M on NAM for 2021 home value losses

    An earlier levy of €181M covered value-loss compensation for the fourth quarter of 2020.

    ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2026:2290

  10. Other
    State levies €116M on NAM for third-quarter 2020 damage

    The levy covered physical damage compensated by the IMG and its costs. A second levy of €153M for the fourth quarter followed on June 7, 2022.

    ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2026:2286