Firm profile No. 33 in the ranking
Eversheds Sutherland
- Rank
- 33
- Score
- 4.08
- Cases
- 2
- Recorded value
- $12.8B
Cases behind the score 2 of 2 with a recorded value
Each case below contributes to Eversheds Sutherland’s score. Open a case to see the recorded parties, counsel and sources.
2 cases
| UK Motor Finance Redress LitigationLenders and a consumer group challenge the UK regulator’s £7.5B car-finance redress scheme | $10,100,000,000 | 2.38 |
| Crescent Petroleum v. NIOCCrescent pursues assets of Iran’s state oil company to enforce a $2.75B award | $2,750,000,000 | 1.71 |
No cases match your search.
The score adds the points of each distinct live case: one point for taking part plus up to two for the case’s significance, rated as for the main index. Calculations use full precision, and displayed points are rounded to two decimal places. Co-counsel receive full credit. A dash in the value column means no usable dollar figure is recorded. Recorded values are approximate and are not necessarily recoveries. This ranking measures participation in major disputes, weighted by their significance, not legal ability or wins. Read the scoring methodology