Firm profile No. 1 in the ranking
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
- Rank
- 1
- Score
- 19.24
- Cases
- 10
- Recorded value
- $91.3B
Cases behind the score 6 of 10 with a recorded value
Each case below contributes to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan’s score. Open a case to see the recorded parties, counsel and sources.
10 cases
| AT1 Bondholders v. FINMABondholders fight Switzerland’s zeroing of $17B in Credit Suisse bonds | $17,000,000,000 | 2.33 |
| Município de Mariana v. BHPBrazilian claimants seek damages from BHP over the 2015 Mariana dam collapse | $47,000,000,000 | 2.16 |
| Gormsen v. MetaFacebook users seek about £3B over Meta’s alleged uncompensated harvesting of their data | $4,000,000,000 | 2.02 |
| Pan-NOx Emissions Group LitigationUK diesel owners pursue defeat-device damages after High Court rejects most allegations | – | 2.00 |
| Uniper v. GazpromUniper seeks to enforce €13B award against Gazprom over undelivered gas | $15,000,000,000 | 1.97 |
| Pampena v. MuskMusk appeals verdict that a 2022 tweet misled Twitter shareholders who sold | $2,600,000,000 | 1.83 |
| Mercuria v. Baltic ExchangeMercuria seeks to invalidate the Baltic Exchange’s Hormuz tanker benchmark assessments | – | 1.79 |
| Amazon v. PerplexityAmazon says Perplexity’s Comet AI agent accesses customer accounts without its authorization | – | 1.75 |
| GEMA v. OpenAIOpenAI appeals Munich ruling that ChatGPT infringes German song lyric copyrights | – | 1.75 |
| Taction v. AppleApple challenges $5.72B verdict finding its Taptic Engine infringes Taction patents | $5,721,961,750 | 1.64 |
No cases match your search.
The score adds the points of each distinct live case: one point for taking part plus up to two for the case’s significance, rated as for the main index. Calculations use full precision, and displayed points are rounded to two decimal places. Co-counsel receive full credit. A dash in the value column means no usable dollar figure is recorded. Recorded values are approximate and are not necessarily recoveries. This ranking measures participation in major disputes, weighted by their significance, not legal ability or wins. Read the scoring methodology